alexmegami: (Default)
[personal profile] alexmegami
Today, you are either going to push my buttons or make me cheer. Going to read articles now.

---

United Church of Christ Backs Same-Sex Marriage

"Today's word is not the last word in the U.C.C. about marriage," Mr. Thomas said. "It is a crucial and groundbreaking first word in a difficult but important churchwide discussion."

He said the church strove to have "diversity without division, unity without uniformity." His hope, he said, is that "we will not run from one another, because if we run from one another we run from Christ."


---

Straight, Gay, or Lying? Bisexuality Revisited

In the new study, a team of psychologists directly measured genital arousal patterns in response to images of men and women. The psychologists found that men who identified themselves as bisexual were in fact exclusively aroused by either one sex or the other, usually by other men.

The study is the largest of several small reports suggesting that the estimated 1.7 percent of men who identify themselves as bisexual show physical attraction patterns that differ substantially from their professed desires.

"Research on sexual orientation has been based almost entirely on self-reports, and this is one of the few good studies using physiological measures," said Dr. Lisa Diamond, an associate professor of psychology and gender identity at the University of Utah, who was not involved in the study.

The discrepancy between what is happening in people's minds and what is going on in their bodies, she said, presents a puzzle "that the field now has to crack, and it raises this question about what we mean when we talk about desire."

"We have assumed that everyone means the same thing," she added, "but here we have evidence that that is not the case."


...

"I'm not denying that bisexual behavior exists," said Dr. Bailey, "but I am saying that in men there's no hint that true bisexual arousal exists, and that for men arousal is orientation."

But other researchers - and some self-identified bisexuals - say that the technique used in the study to measure genital arousal is too crude to capture the richness - erotic sensations, affection, admiration - that constitutes sexual attraction.



...

About 1.5 percent of American women identify themselves bisexual. And bisexuality appears easier to demonstrate in the female sex. A study published last November by the same team of Canadian and American researchers, for example, found that most women who said they were bisexual showed arousal to men and to women.

Although only a small number of women identify themselves as bisexual, Dr. Bailey said, bisexual arousal may for them in fact be the norm.

Date: 2005-07-05 02:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kisekileia.livejournal.com
"But other researchers - and some self-identified bisexuals - say that the technique used in the study to measure genital arousal is too crude to capture the richness - erotic sensations, affection, admiration - that constitutes sexual attraction."

I agree with that. People can be attracted to different genders or types of people in different ways.

Date: 2005-07-05 03:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bradbeattie.livejournal.com
Although only a small number of women identify themselves as bisexual, Dr. Bailey said, bisexual arousal may for them in fact be the norm.

I can't see the full article (registration? phooey), but that's a pretty strong claim to make. To say that what 1.5% women identify as is the norm (80% or more?) is a fairly tall claim. You'll have roughly 98.5% disagreeing with you, so you'd better have something to back that up with, Dr. Bailey.

Some time ago, someone I know claimed that sexuality on the Kinsey scale fits a bell curve (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal_distribution). He claimed by this that the majority of people are bisexual, although evidence would disagree with this (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_sexual_orientation#Modern_survey_results). It's not that I'm against the idea, I just don't see it fitting with the stats we have on sexual orientation thus far.

Date: 2005-07-05 03:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theeternalmind.livejournal.com
I can't see the full article (registration? phooey), but that's a pretty strong claim to make. To say that what 1.5% women identify as is the norm (80% or more?) is a fairly tall claim.

I think that the article (or the doctor himself) words this poorly - what Dr. Bailey means is that, among bisexual women, being bisexually aroused is normal for them. I could always been misinterpreting, though.

Date: 2005-07-05 03:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bradbeattie.livejournal.com
From what I read here, it seems that he's making the leap from "bisexual women are aroused by both sexes" to "most women are aroused by both sexes". 'Course, I might be misreading it.

Date: 2005-07-05 05:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theeternalmind.livejournal.com
That's how I read it at first, myself. I'm reading it the way I did because that conclusion would be reasonable, and I am making the assumption that this doctor is also reasonable, and this article is simply quoting him badly.

Date: 2005-07-05 06:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] roju.livejournal.com
To say that what 1.5% women identify as is the norm (80% or more?) is a fairly tall claim.

See Obesity and denial. Anyhoo, it would be interesting to see some follow-up studies.

Date: 2005-07-05 07:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bradbeattie.livejournal.com
I could read that in two ways.

1. Bisexual arousal is the norm for bisexual women. Bisexual arousal is not the norm for bisexual men.

2. Bisexual arousal is the norm for all women. Hetero or homosexual arousal is the norm for all men.

Which do you mean?

Date: 2005-07-05 07:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bradbeattie.livejournal.com
Ah, cool. I can't tell if Dr. So-and-so is claiming the first or the second (ambiguity, how I hate thee). The first is a much tighter claim and seems reasonable. I'm curious to see more of the study, if that's what the evidence points towards. The second is a much broader claim that would require much more evidence to convince me.

Date: 2005-07-05 05:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] musesshadow.livejournal.com
It would be interesting to note how much variation were available in these videos as well. It could just be that they didn't have the subject's preferred physical characteristics displayed on screen (i.e. they didn't show any red-heads).

This is indeed a pretty crude test, and I'd want to see the testing documentation before I slighted it - but I do have to say based on my own empirical evidence that bisexuality as they qualify it here does exist :)

Profile

alexmegami: (Default)
alexmegami

November 2017

S M T W T F S
    1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 20th, 2025 10:35 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios