For Allie

Jul. 23rd, 2006 10:38 pm
alexmegami: (Default)
The characteristics of a cult/new religious movement, as defined in Sociology 262 at the University of Waterloo by professor Lorne Dawson, Jan 5 2005.

(That is to say: some things may have changed, but it is fairly recent information.)

There are two basic types of cults: "innovative" (Scientology, etc.) and "imported" (Hare Krishna, etc.)

The following characteristics are "ideals" of each type. Cults are a kind of offshoot of sects, which will be explained a little later. I'm going to do up the chart that we were given, as it seems easiest...

CHURCH/SECT TYPOLOGY
FeatureChurchSect
Membershipinvoluntary (because of parents), inclusive, heterogeneousvoluntary, exclusive, homogenous
Beliefs/PracticesMore dogmatic (but just accepting basic beliefs is OK), ritualisticMore radical, "stern" (require deeper faith/involvement), inspirational
LeadershipHired/appointed, professional/trainedLay leadership, chosen because of charisma
OrganizationMore hierarchical, impersonal administrationSmaller, more democratic, personal
Attitude to Dominant SocietyAccomodatingBorn of schism (either with larger religious group or society), often protest society (vice, etc.)


KEY FEATURES OF CULTS
1. Primarily concerned with satisfying the needs and desires of its members.
2. Lay claim to esoteric knowledge that has been lost (ex. Templars), discovered (ex. Atlantis), or repressed (ex. "true self"/Thetan)
3. Offer some kind of direct, ecstatic, or transfiguring experience (ex. magic)
4. Focused on a charismatic leader - often, a cult will disintegrate when the leader dies or is discredited
(5. Society tends to see them as "subversive")
Why cults became so popular - and reviled )

Who joins cults? )
...if people want me to keep typing up my notes, I'm more than glad to do the "four main points" of the cults that we studied, as well as my notes on "the Cult Conversion Controversy" (read: why not to trust Margaret Singer or Steve Hassan) and "Violence and Cults".

(The specific cults we studied in depth: neopaganism, Unification Church, Branch Davidians, Scientology, Hare Krishna/ISKCON, and I may have notes on Shambhala.)
alexmegami: (Default)
Max gets an e-cookie, for guessing that the correct answer to this question is seven.

Off the top of my head: Jonestown/Peoples Temple, Heaven's Gate, Waco/the Branch Davidians (was fatal not because of anything the group did, but rather the BATF's fuckups), Solar Temple, Aum Shinrikyo, the Manson Family, and, looking it up, Movement for the Restoration of the Ten Commandments of God.

And yet.

Most people don't blink at Wicca/neopaganism, despite the fact that it is a cult/NRM. (They might assume it's satanic in nature.) Most have never heard of Shambhala/Vajradhatu, despite the fact that their main community is in Canada, for example. Those that people do know of are often vilified (Unification Church and Scientology both come to mind), often without reason or due to massive amounts of misinformation.

It's really kind of sad.
alexmegami: (Default)
People who act as if they know what cults are like, without having EVER studied them, and make sweeping negative judgments about them based on what the Cult Awareness Network and their local news channels tell them


FUCKING PISS ME OFF.


Quick. Have a gander at it. OUT OF THE TWO THOUSAND KNOWN CULTS/NEW RELIGIOUS MOVEMENTS OF THE PAST FEW YEARS, HOW MANY HAVE BEEN VIOLENT TO THEMSELVES OR OTHERS?

(Number will be taken from Dawson's book, so if you've read it [Pete Hamm], you don't get to answer.)

The closest person gets an e-cookie.

Profile

alexmegami: (Default)
alexmegami

November 2017

S M T W T F S
    1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 1st, 2025 07:00 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios