The first few arguments are based upon actual philosophical arguments about the existence of God, but the person(s) presenting them have committed one of the worst logical fallacies: inconsistent comparison.
While the arguments referred to are about as convincing, they are much more validly constructed. You really should read them yourself (i.e. take philosophy 100).
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2003-08-07 07:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-07 08:54 am (UTC)ARGUMENT FROM ATHEISM
(1) Unicorns don't exist.
(2) Therefore, God exists.
*shakes head*
*glomps Max*
no subject
Date: 2003-08-07 01:35 pm (UTC)Philosophical doorknobs and other household items
Date: 2003-08-07 07:13 pm (UTC)While the arguments referred to are about as convincing, they are much more validly constructed. You really should read them yourself (i.e. take philosophy 100).
Re: Philosophical doorknobs and other household items
Date: 2003-08-07 08:00 pm (UTC)